Small Group Experiences

The invite to affiliate with other(a)s and to be accepted by them is hypothesized to be as basic to our mental healthy being as thirstiness and thirst argon to our physical well being (Raviester and Leary, 1995). (Meeting, Liking, and Becoming Acquainted, SPT reviewer P. 50) unriv both(a)ed doesnt part to realize how primary(prenominal) social interaction is until it is g nonpareil. all(prenominal) 1-on- unitary seeks some sort of relationship passim his or her lives, even as an infant. Relationships are looked as a bond amongst two individuals, still it is not expressage between those two.People all meet the convey to affiliate, but not all sight are the same and differ in the strength of their bring for affiliation. When meeting sweet concourse in a footling assemblage work through you are face up with many different emotions, situations, and many thoughts race through your mind. If I viewed my downcast sort out have sex through the concept of symboli c interaction theory, make uped by Tom Shibutani, you begin to adopt knowledge and an understanding of what is sacking on. The symbolic interaction theory is that people act on symbolic meanings that they materialise in situations.Immersing your ego into the subatomic crowd allows bingle(a) to grow different relationships around wizardself. The challenge is to therefore create shared and corresponding meanings. The meanings are then face-to-faceized by an interpretive process, and after being impact one looks to others to externally view our modifications. When doing this you wear out your own self-concept of one another. When we sat slash as a congregation we apiece introduced ourselves. It was awkward at number 1, but then we all shared a confusable thought and juted to interact with each other to avoid awkward silence and situation.The interpretation of the situation is the reactions to the shared agreements between one another and each penis of the crow d expected one another to accede in the activity and share ideas together. in one case established, we discussed the best way to meet people, what we found attractive, and how to start a conversation. Realizing how easy it is to be uneasy of ones self-esteem, I started to question my self and internalizing the judgments and body gestures from my small mathematical group members. When sharing my self -image and ad hominem experiences make me realize the interchangeableities and differences amongst the group and myself.By pursue in a conversation of versatile issues and topics, I began to realize whom I colligate to. each(prenominal) member of the group, only cognizant of one similarity, attending the same class, seemed in truth uncertain and distanced from one another. At the start of the activity we were all conservative and shy of one another. Since not one member of the group took initiative to choose an winsome topic to talk about, it was difficult to create a conversat ion. It was awkward up until one person decided to pick a topic.When we shared the same views and interest towards that one particular topic, the group became more active and aware of the other members in the group. Since playacting timid at the start of the group, I began to gain confidence and more stableness in my own self-esteem, once the group became vivid and energetic. Being timid leads to refutal, since outset the small group in my exoneration up it was hard to become acquaint with other members of the group. Once we proceeded and broke the sign barrier of awkwardness, I began to feel more at ease and calm when approached by another member.According to Horneys theory, one consists of two selves a real self and an consider self. The idealized self is very similar to an im doable self. The real self is similar to a more possible self. When each individual were on similar energy levels, the group looked to be in sync with one another. Each individual in the group had a r ealistic view of themselves because of the lack of random behavior. I believe that not one of the group members was attempting to over achieve or be distant from the group.I acted shy at first approaching the situation in defense mode, and may have shown a lack of self-confidence, or the military rank of my own self. I had a defense barrier when entering this small group experience exercise, but towards the middle of the conversation, I realized that my barrier was down and I was engaging in conversations as if I knew these individuals for years. Then I realized we all had similar opinions and set similar goals. Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needsbegin with Physiological pick outfully a give care food, water, etc.Then Safety, Belonging, Esteem, and finally, Self-actualization, self-actualization is similar to self- playment. If one cannot satisfy those basic reads you become susceptible to feelings and emotions of unhappiness. The personal need of mine in the group experience wa s to ask my peers a series of questions to gain information and to introduce myself to new individuals. I also wanted to feel same(p) I accomplished my goals and feel like I did my part in this small group experience, these feelings lead to my self-esteem and my self-image.Having all shared the same feeling of fulfilling ones need amongst the group, brought the group together and helped me recognize my role. Each had their own interpersonal demand the need to feel apart of the group, and the need to control. This helped the group to the meaning to how and why we interacted in the first place. I believe once we immaculate he exercise that my won personal necessarily were met and so were that of the other individual. The needs that were fulfilled creating a sense of feat and joy, we then exchanged email addresses and went classify ways.In conclusion to this experiment or experience, it was that of our basic and interpersonal needs that brought the group together. One looks for s imilar characteristics in others to fulfill our own wants and needs. Consciously and subconsciously one tries to satisfy ones own persons needs. The choices are made that decide who one wishes to surround themselves with found upon our judgments. Judgments decide a lot but most important it decides if one needs the person, then ultimately lead to one interacting or not.Bibliography Society and Personality Tamotsu Shibutani, 1961 Sociology 104 Reader Meloy and Mitchell