Thursday, February 28, 2019

Context and History of Conflict Paper Essay

This essay will discuss the issues betwixt two people, Robert and Denise Patton, on with how these issues affect their two children. To enable an intelligence of the worry a summary of the nature and history of the competitiveness has been given. In addition, a wait on at the interaction of interests, goals, and the power of severally party consent tos an understanding of each persons position and role in the combat as well as personal attempts at resolution of the puzzle. In working to make up ones mind this dispute there will be strategies discussed which, if Robert and Denise ar willing to apply, could help them resolve the conflicts that they are facing in their man and married woman. abbreviation of the Nature and History of the ConflictThe Patton Family case study has different types of conflict inside it. The summary of the conflict starting with the family dynamic gives a look of what is happening with the family from an outsider looking inward. To an outsider the family is in shambles they press regularly, and it seems that the parents have concern about one child whole. In the beginning, the parents were riant they both were on a path that looked successful.They both were in college and had abundant jobs after college. Once they started a family things changed for the couple. The mother wanted to be a part of the childrens lives more, so she quit her job and found a nonher(prenominal) that worked with her schedule. The parents fought frequently about the youngest child and how to parent him. Since the parents were non getting along for a while the husband finally had enough. He decided to come out the house and tell his married woman he wants a divorce.The husband and wife blame each other for the failed marriage, and the youngest child blames himself for his bring forths leaving. Without an defense or other form of resolution, the trust on both sides is compromised, and may not know what to expect from this person in the fut ure (Scott, 2011 p. 2). When the father left over(p) he never sat down with his children or wife to let off why it had come to this. The father finally had enough with his wife, solely he did not explain his reasoning. Con textbook of ConflictThe context of the conflict is that two parents have separated after a long marriage resulting from arising conflicts in the marriage. The couple hastwo children one who is almost an adult, and the other is a young child who seems to have trouble with his energy at home office and at school. The conflict started to occur more frequently and more gratingly as their second child started having problems in school. One parent, the mother, believes that there is something falsely with him and that he requires special attention with him all the time.A child with these kinds of behaviors would plow costly and would require significant attention. The other parent believes that his son is fairish spoiled and requires normal attention and discipli ne. He further believes that these luxuries have left his son vulnerable with a lack of awareness for his surroundings. Whether or not the parents are splitting, they were a team trying to provide for their two children. When managing conflicts, collectivized cultures place more emphasis on the avoidance and accommodation of conflicts because collectivists value harmony, security, and conformity (Hong, 2008). Interactions of Interests, Goals, and PowerThe interests, goals, and power of both parents are that they cannot stand each other and need space in to function. One believes that he does not receive enough attention from his family and wife, and that they show no gratitude for his hard work. He has been working for many years and has primarily been the sole wage-earner in the family. The wife feels that her family does not appreciate her. She feels that she has lost her active role in the environment of her oldest child and husband. Her focus has been her young son who has be en having these troubles at school and home. This metre of pressure has shut her out of everyones world except her son, who does not know what is going between the two split parents. According to the text the conflict above may be substituting for intimacy and connection, or it may serve as a launching pad for problem solving (Hocker & Wilmot, 2011). Attempts Made at Conflict ResolutionThere are competing family goals regarding Arnie (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011). Robert believes lack of discipline is the cause and wants Arnie to be held accountable whereas Denise believes there is a neurological basis and believes Arnie should be tested and treated according to his perceived needs. Though both parents have expressed ideas for dealing with the problem they have not agreed on a method, nor given significant shape to the others opinion in this matter. The conflict has evolved and in the march a couple of resolution tactics have been used. Early in the conflict, aggression and competition were used, with each attempting to use power of position as a tool to win the battle. Rob made the money and obdurate it would not be used for mental health treatment Denise was primitive care-giver and as such was responsible for seeing that Arnies needs were met. shrieking matches to coerce the other into submission failed and eventually gave way to avoidance (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011). detachment from the conflict equated to withdrawal from the relationship as the couple slept apart and ceased conversation (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011). The interactions that did take place were interpreted based upon past events, setting the prototype for what each could expect from the other, likely feeding into rather than helping to resolve the conflict (Coltri, 2010). Roberts final act of avoidance was for self-protection he moved out to protect himself from further emotional harm (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011). ad hominem Initial replys or Strategies for Resolving this Conflict Personal Initial Reac tionThe initial reaction to the conflict between Robert and Denise is that they should agree to intermediation as a mean of solving their disagreement. Denise relies on Robert for complete financial arrest for their family. The problem here is Denise does not want to work because of their sons neurological condition. Robert believes differently about Denise not wanting to work and feels that Denise is development Arnies condition as an excuse. Robert and Denise seek legal reference work, after Robert leaves the home. schema for Resolving this Conflict juristic consultation has it advantage but mediation would be better in this situation. Most lawyers discuss with clients if they should choose mediation based on their situations. Mediation would give the couple the opportunity to explain their side of the situation in privacy. Attorneys are contacted for legal advice but mediation is for solving issues and helping the couple to make the right decision. An attorney represents on ly the client who has retained his or her service and not for solving theproblems. A mediator has a neutral part and only help in resolving the issues.Mediation taken place in courts is not secluded and the judge makes decision on the case. In the case of Robert and Denise, mediation would allow them to decide the outcome. The best thing for Robert and Denise is to have a mediator front man to help settle property, child support, and custody issues. According to Divorceinfo (2013) The mediator remain neutral between the husband and the wife. That means the mediator cant give advice to both party, and also cant act as a lawyer for either party. ConclusionRobert and Denise Patton seek legal consultation as a mean of finding ways of settling their conflicts. Legal consultation provides the couple with advice on the best avenue to take in solving their problems. Once the two meet with their lawyer, the couple is told if they should have a mediator there with his or her lawyer. Media tors do not represent either of the couple, only the individuals lawyers do.

No comments:

Post a Comment