Difficult People Essay -- essays research papers

                    Difficult People Analysis     1.     In the beginning-part temporary hookup outline, Pyotr is a frustrated youth who strives to balance his financial expenditures to that of the amount of his suffers busted income. The effort to consume fathers pension for Pyotrs schooling creates a serious interrogation to the financial security of every member in household. Pyotrs father is a disappointment to the family, his anti-social behavior has subdued the family into a state of fear and panic at the harsh tone of his voice.     In the middle-part plot outline, Pyotr now fantasizes nigh the possibilitys of leaving the farm and walking the eighty miles North to Moscow. He would piece a capacity for impunity to the familys grief of a missing son. Pyotr will be inspired by a sole motivation, the relentless three mean solar day wa lk to Moscow. The journey will submit a stream of fatal consequences as a cause of starvation, frostbite and fatigue, the capability to overcome this cross to the physical appearance would only better saturate the mental ability for perseverance and determination to reach the destination.      The final logic of plot that must be explained at the end of the degree is Pyotrs confrontation with his guilt-ridden, contemptuous father before he leaves for Moscow. The intent to reconcile fathers financial loss is expressed through Pyotrs coaxing rhetoric and judgemental approach to his fathers daily attitude at the table. Fin all toldy, the room is brightly lit, not by the familys ability to regroup--their affections were a balefire now--but by a single, dazzling beam of sympathy to Pyotr, when his father says "Good-bye...the silver is on the round table."2.     The main negate of this story is a resolving of the familys financial s tatus. Fathers greed, low income, and Pyotrs frustration are key points to the main conflict. The conflict has plagued Pyotr or so, the hallucination of abandoning his family is the main conflict in the story.3.     The nature of conflict is most likely the man vs self "setting". As oppose to a man vs man/machine/nature alternative, man striving ag... ...hers abuse. Pyotr adds perspicacity and perception to the story, he has nothing but contempt for his fathers attitude. Stagnation in a family built to destruct, Pyotr must leave the house.10.     The tone of voice is eqaully balance between Pyotr and his father. The mother has little or nothing to say during a mealtime strain. When Pyotrs mother tells her husband "(Pyotr)... must have money for the journey" the argument sets place and very soon Pyotrs father is screaming "Take everything...Take it all...Strangle me" The ability to immediately subdue the conflict by acknowledging the personal break of serve of sparking the financial debate goes unnoticed. 11.     The dialogue delivers reality to the domestic situation. Pyotr begins "I utilise to be able to put up with such scenes...but now I have got out of the way of it" Pyotrs father retorts "...Do you know what you cost me, you villain? Ill turn you out" This is the most effective scene in the story because Pyotrs father delivers the threat, his wife and daughter bear witness to the intimidation that is unrestrained by Pyotrs need for money.