Psychology of Terrorism Essay

In his article, Vaisman-Tzachor (2006) discussed the nearly common misconceptions regarding terrorist compose in rhetorical psychology. True, where effective forensic profiling techniques are absent, there is no authority for effective counterterrorism strategies. In this context, the profiling criteria described by Vaisman-Tzachor (2006) are in particular interesting and important when applied to psychological profile of Osama Bin sloshed.From the standstill of forensic psychology, and through the prism of Vaisman-Tzachors (2006) psychological criteria, forensic profiling of Osama Bin Laden should begin with the profound analysis of his personal footing (age, educational basis, ethnicity, socio-economic status, national origin and marital status, religious or mixer affiliations). Contrary to traditional (and probably, outdated beliefs), the national origin of Osama Bin Laden forget play important, notwithstanding not the primary role in creating the picture of his perso nality.Of course, elements such as Arab ethnic or national background are highly important in the list of the determinant variables (Vaisman-Tzachor, 2006), but psychological profile of Osama Bin Laden seems even more unchanging with the fact that he is unmarried, possesses sufficient material background and displays negative inclination to the non-Muslim society.Simultaneously, Osama Bin Laden does not match the criminal profile created by Vaisman-Tzachor (2006), where the likelihood of a terrorist act is inversely related to the age of the dominance terrorist in case of Osama, his age is evidently associated with the ontogeny terrorist experience and the change magnitude sophistication of his terrorist needs.Objectively, and truly for many generations of terrorists, Osama Bin Laden is fairly regarded a descriptor of a mythical figure, who represents a messianic being to members of those national groups and societal entities, who are disenfranchised by political, religious, or ethnic flock (Vaisman-Tzachor, 2006), and this mythical figure works to establish closer ties and strengthen the exist terrorist identifications in his terrorist ne iirks. In this context, Osama Bin Laden is a multifaceted examine of the leader, whose criminality and respectability are uniquely combined to shape the stark naked vision of a charismatic terrorist.Historical and sociocultural antecedents of kinsfolk 11 The escalation of international violence and the growing anti-American moods put one across generated a dictated of questions regarding the historical and sociocultural antecedents of September 11. Objectively, a whole set of factors present contributed into the development of violent attitudes toward American nation, of which September 11 was the culmination in this context, the continuous political commitment to low devotion conflicts and the self-declared pro-American political orientation which lacks authoritarian rule and visible religiosity view as conk out the two most important antecedents of the 9/11 attack.In his book, Michaels (2002) refers to the low intensity conflict scenario, to which American presidency adhered over the course of the last decades. The resolve of anti-terrorist ideals and the deceptive need for maintaining low intensity wars in the most knotty international regions was expected to strengthen the military machine machine power of the United States, and to crack that America was able to respond to the most challenging social and military conflicts all over the world.What the United States had obviously overlooked was that the gradual military expansion might not have been favored by opposite nations (Michaels, 2002). Increased military spending combined with the overt rejection of treaty opportunities have formed the set of historical antecedents which led to the emergence of the new tonus relationships between the two worlds the Muslim and the orthodox. After the fall of socialism in the world, the rhetoric of the American hyperpower has literally doubled, and all visions of authority and power have since then been projected onto the U.S. (Werz, 2004). Given historically relevant anti-American attitudes, the multiplying American superiority has frozen the cultural difference between the two worlds. The social development in America has been colored with obvious secularization of the existence opinion and the values, which the American nation has treated as its own (Werz, 2004). Thus, the events of September 11 have come as the culmination in the growing opposition against the militaristic attitudes of the United States towards its political and cultural superiority.Psychology of terrorism In the aftermath of 9/11 attacks investigateers and psychology professionals have come increasingly concerned about the origins and the motives of terrorist attacks. The electric current state of empirical look for is pressured by numerous prejudices and misconceptions that have gro wn as a return of the overt callousness of terrorist attacks. By turning terrorists into a group of abnormally deviant people, however, psychologists have seriously distorted the real image of a true terrorist.Silke (2004) is correct we cannot be certain that terrorism is a kind of psychological abnormality, unless we are able to avoid bias and to promote objectiveness in our judgments. It is difficult not to agree to Silke (2004) in that the differences in the current research of terrorism have become the results of our inability to explore and text file primary information, and the impossibility to access primary sources of information about terrorists.The risks gnarled for the potential researcher are considerable. Academic researchers have been threatened, kidnapped, attacked, and shot for attempting to research terrorism (Silke, 2004). In our quest for better understanding of terrorist psychology, we frequently become the victims of our own psychological misconceptions. We still operate scarce and unclear (as nearly as unreliable) data concerning the major emotional and psychological issues terrorists face on their way to a violent act.Seeking sensations, we tend to neglect the role which primary data may play in developing and bedcover a completely new vision of terrorism. With the scarcity of tools of psychological and sociological research which could be readily applied to terrorism, and bearing in heading an almost complete impossibility to access primary sources of data, it is unlikely that we will be able to produce a single relevant and the most objective psychological profile of a terrorist in the coming decade.References Michaels, C. W. (2002). No greater threat America after September 11 and the deck out of a national security state. Algora Publishing. Silke, A. (2004). Courage in dark places reflections on terrorist psychology. Social Research, 71 (1) 177-198. Vaisman-Tzachor, R. (2006). Psychological profiles of Terrorists. Forensic Ex aminer, 15 (2) 6-17. Werz, M. (2004). Anti-Americanism and ambivalence Remarks on an ideology in historical transformation. Telos, 129 75-95.