The Unabomber: Is He Serious? Essay -- essays research papers

The Unabomber Is He Serious?There comes a measure when everyone has something to say. The next stepwould be to find person to listen. If that doesnt work, I work out you justhave to make them listen.The Unabombers Manifesto was probably one of the near interesting andthought provoking points of view that I have film in a while. Its just too badthat every judgment of conviction he made a point that I could relate with, he would contradicthimself before I was undefiled with the paragraph. In my opinion, the entiremanifesto and every viewpoint expressed therein, was a strange mix of confusion, incident and storytelling. Although written with an abundance of detail and manystrong convictions, I finished chooseing the selection without being able to seethe purpose lowlife it each(prenominal) and what he stood to gain. Im sure that wasntexactly his intentions when he wrote it.I feeling there is one thing the author deserves credit for right from the decease his uncanny ability to set a pessimistic mood. From the minute you look at the introduction, he, assuming the author is male, begins to paint apicture of desolation and demise of the world in which we live. What couldca determination such a calamity? According to the author, it would have to be industryand technology of all things. He was convinced that due to the industrial-technological system in which we live, ultimately man are going to besubjected to world wide suffering and ineluctably a total shut down of mankindity.Now at this piece I felt a little disbelief. I had heard he was actually anintelligent person, but I was starting to wonder. His whole surmise was based on the fact, that at one point or another,the human race will be taken to the point of complete travel down. He feels thatif its bound to happen, we should make it happen now. The longer we wait, themore throng will suffer. Now, I know our sun will eventually burn out, so doesthat mean that it should be the concern of every one on the planet to attire amethod to destroy it immediately and save us the stir up of having to do itlater? I guess I wasnt too surprise when I read how he intended to induce anearly geological fault down with a revolution, but the next thing I read left me a littleconfused. I was interested in how and when he planned to d... ...here who actually make a difference. Technology was a turning point in mans struggle in life. When wewere first learning to use it, we used it for the wrong reasons. I believe weremoving past that now. We dont cultism technology same he does any more. More andmore people, including of age(p) generations are learning to use it. Not becausethey have to, but its save natural for the majority of us to try something new.When everyone begins to use it, working together, thats what advances us intotomorrow. If everyone was as pessimistic as he, where would we be? Sometimesit takes someone like him to remind us what we used to be and how we used tothink. It helps us all stay on track. In the long run, he just becomes someonewho wouldnt change and society will forget him. Its ironic to think that wealready have. People dont want war, revolution, or violence. We dont need tobe the aggressor and more. Our excerption isnt assured, but at least we have themeans to provide it, to rightfully harvest it when that need arises. People likethe Unibomber only give us the motivation to keep on going. And what do we haveto thank for our cash advance? Technology.