Descartes and Darwin Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Descartes and Darwin - Essay ExampleSecondly, the paper will explore how history and modern comprehension has added more weight to the views of Darwin which suggests that this view may be more correct in its nature. The Debate on Human Nature One of the most well- cognise parts of Descartes philosophical views is the concept that to be man is to be composed of two incompatible pieces the body and the soul. The body is full of the natural processes, whilst the soul contains both the information that we need to be ourselves, including all of our decision-making faculties and our personalities (Descartes, 2006). These two components, perhaps communicating through the pineal gland, be thoroughly diametric in composition and matter. Descartes would argue that benevolent nature is partially comprised of the soul which mintnot be explained by recognition and therefore there are elements of ourselves that science cannot explain. Descartes did, however, suggest that the mind depends s o very much on temperament and the disposition of ones bodily organs that, if it is possible to find a way to arouse people generally more wise and more skilful than they have been in the past, I imagine that we should run across for it in medicine (Descartes, 2006, p45), meaning that there are roughly elements of human nature which should look to science for explanation. Charles Darwin had very different ideas. Often known as the father of evolution, Darwin explored a great repress of scientific concepts pertaining to human and animal sort, often finding that these two concepts were linked and very similar. This view can be illustrated from Darwins words that it has often and confidently been asserted, that mans origin can never be known but ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science (Darwin, 1871, p4). This erect shows Darwins faith in science, and the power of science to explain even the inexplicable. Human nature is no exception from this rule, and as Darwin suggests, there is no fundamental difference between man and the higher animals in their mental faculties (Darwin, 1971, p34). Having studied a number of animal behaviors throughout his career, it is obvious that Darwin had more interaction with different creatures and therefore more information to draw his strong conclusion about human nature from. As the father of evolution, it is obvious that Darwin will favor an evolutionary perspective of human nature, one that suggests that all elements of our behavior and other aspects of cosmos a human can be explained by science. Although there were some gaps in the evidence Darwin provided for this hypothesis, these have been slowly filled since the publication of The Descent of Man and are continually being updated as time goes on. It is perhaps the fact that Darwins work fits so neatly wit h modern science which makes it the more appealing hypothesis, as explained further below. These views are evidently at odds with each other. Although Descartes does horrify the reader to the importance of science and medicine, it is evident from Discourse on the Method that there are some things that Descartes feels are inexplicable. This may seem like a feasible resolution to come to, as human nature and personalities appear to be extremely complicated and different from those of other